Ninth Circuit Judge Lawrence VanDyke ignites controversy by submitting a video in which he reviews various handguns as part of his dissent against a California law limiting gun magazine capacity to 10 rounds. In the 18-minute video, filmed in his chambers and featuring a mounted AK-47 in the background, VanDyke asserts that many judges lack a fundamental understanding of handguns and claims that California’s law is “unrealistic” and unadministrable.
His video dissent has faced severe criticism from colleagues, with multiple judges stating that it violates courtroom standards and undermines the judicial process. Senior Judge Marsha Berzon articulates the concern that VanDyke appears to act as an expert witness, a role not appropriate for a judge in making legal decisions. These unprecedented actions raise questions about judicial conduct and the integration of personal beliefs into the courtroom.
Read full story at news.bloomberglaw.com
