Federal Judge Lawrence VanDyke publicly criticizes his Ninth Circuit colleagues for their perceived ignorance about firearms in a rare YouTube video dissent. This unusual action follows the court’s recent decision to uphold California’s ban on magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds, which the majority claims is consistent with historical regulations on dangerous weapon components.
In his video, Judge VanDyke asserts that his colleagues are living in a “factual fantasy” regarding gun rights and restrictions, provoking questions about judicial understanding of Second Amendment principles. His dissent highlights a significant divide in legal interpretation of gun control laws, inviting viewers to reconsider the complexity of such regulations and the implications for firearm ownership across the United States.
Read full story at www.washingtonexaminer.com
