A federal judge in New York has upheld the state and city ban on stun guns and tasers, marking a significant decision in the ongoing debate over the legality of such self-defense weapons. Judge Edgardo Ramos ruled that the plaintiffs challenging the ban failed to demonstrate that stun guns and tasers are “commonly used” by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes, emphasizing a critical standard established by the Second Amendment.
The court noted a lack of substantial evidence from plaintiffs regarding the prevalence of these weapons, which could inform whether they are widely accepted for self-defense in New York City. This ruling stands in contrast to recent court decisions in other states that have struck down similar bans, highlighting the complex, evolving landscape of gun rights and regulations across the United States.
Read full story at reason.com