Unpack This Article's Arsenal
Concealed Carry Reciprocity: Understanding the Nitty-Gritty of Federal & State-Level Laws
Let’s cut through the bull, partner, and dive straight in. We are here to break down the nitty-gritty of “concealed carry reciprocity.” We’ll make sure you saddle up with the latest federal laws, state-level laws, and what all this gun-toting terminology really means.
At the moment, there is an absurd patchwork of state-level laws covering the right to carry a concealed weapon, and responsible gun owners often accidentally commit crimes by traveling across state lines with their concealed weapon.
Get Great Guns And Ammo Deals!
SAFEST NEWSLETTER - WE WILL NEVER SELL YOUR EMAIL
No Spam - No Selling Your Email
What’s The Rundown on Concealed Carry Reciprocity?
I bet you’re sitting there, wondering ‘Hey, what the hell is concealed carry reciprocity anyway?’ Basically, it’s all about how states recognize the permits issued by others. Let’s paint a clear picture for you.
Say you’re a Texan. At home, you’ve got the right to strut around with a concealed handgun. But suppose you set foot in Maryland. Here, the laws are tighter than a rattlesnake’s grip. Without Maryland’s recognition of Texas’s permits (reciprocity), you could be in deep doo-doo. That’s what we’re talking about here, concealed carry reciprocity.
Federal Law News – The Law of the Land
The federal law has been clear as mud about concealed carry. But U.S. Code Title 18, Part I, Chapter 44, provides some insight.
However, the bill titled “Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017” promised to change the game. It had passed the House but got served roadkill in the Senate, meaning as of now, no single, unifying federal law governs concealed carry reciprocity.
If it passed, it’d mean any person with a concealed carry permit or residing from a permit-less state could sling a hidden weapon in any state that allows concealed carry. But, it hasn’t. For now, the law of the land is more like the law of the specific land you’re standing on.
State-Level Concealed Carry Reciprocity Laws – It’s a Twisted Trail
State laws vary more than the grains on a sand dune and the key thing here is to know your geography. It’s a state’s prerogative whether to accept out-of-state concealed carry permits. Essentially we’ve got three types of states:
Shall-Issue States
These states are obliged to give out concealed carry permits as long as you meet the state’s criteria, but reciprocity varies.
May-Issue States
These states have an extra layer of red tape. They “may” issue a permit if you meet their criteria plus a “good reason” for concealed carry.
No-Issue/Restricted States
These states have the tightest britches. Good luck getting a permit unless you’re law enforcement.
The Case For Federal Concealed Carry Reciprocity Legislation
The problem is that concealed carry reciprocity is a classic example of the application of Federal power on individual States, something which I normally oppose.
Historically, the power of our home states were what protected us against the normally anti-gun Federal government. This was especially true during the Obama years. As a liberal conservative, I therefore found myself arguing strongly, for many years, that the rights of my own State should not be overrun by the Fed.
On the other side, the debate over the bill has exposed a strange paradox in the position of the ideological left: while they remain committed to the big state, and to ridiculous levels of Federal oversight, in this particular area they hypocritically recognize States’ rights.
It seems, therefore, that the bill has inverted the normal positions of right and left on the balance of power between government and States. You may have your own feelings about this, of course, but I would say that as pragmatic conservatives, we should be flexible: it is no hypocrisy to say that, in this particular issue, the House needs to act to protect our freedoms.
FAQs
Here are some of the most common questions about Concealed Carry Reciprocity:
What does Concealed Carry Reciprocity Mean?
Concealed Carry Reciprocity refers to an agreement between states that acknowledge and respect the legality of concealed carry licenses from other states. Basically, if your concealed carry permit is issued in State A, and State A has a reciprocity agreement with State B, you are allowed to concealed carry in State B without any issues, adhering to State B’s laws.
How Can I Find out which States Have Reciprocity with Mine?
Many states’ official websites have maps and lists of their reciprocal states, detailing their concealed carry agreement. Websites like the United States Concealed Carry Association also provide up-to-date maps of reciprocity across the country. However, never make assumptions and always double-check this information with a reliable source.
Does a Permit from One State Automatically Mean I Can Carry in All States?
No, not necessarily. Different states have differing gun laws and standards of reciprocity. Some states do not accept any out-of-state concealed carry permits, while others may only accept permits from a select few. It’s crucial to understand and respect these laws when traveling with a concealed carry firearm.
Can I Carry a Concealed Firearm on Federal Property or National Parks?
Federal law prohibits firearms on certain federal property, such as military installations and government buildings. However, as of February 22, 2010, it is legal to carry a firearm for self-defense purposes in national parks and wildlife refuges as long as you comply with the firearm laws of the state in which the park or refuge is located. Check here for all the latest news.
What Happens if I Carry in a non-Reciprocal State?
Carrying a concealed weapon in a non-reciprocal state can land you in legal trouble – often resulting in fines, arrest, and potential loss of your weapon. It’s essential to stay updated on the concealed carry laws of each state you intend to travel to or through, for your safety and legal protection.
So, What’s The Bottom Line on Concealed Carry Reciprocity?
It’s the wild west out there. Well, more like a stark, confusing mosaic of laws where one misstep can land you in a world of hurt. Whether we see changes on a federal level is about as predictable as a bull in a China shop. But the key takeaway here for you, gunslinger, is knowing your turf. Understand the laws of your home state and the states you plan to traipse through.
Summing it all up: It’s a twisted trail of a myriad concealed carry reciprocity laws, with each state playing by its drumroll. As of today, no blanket federal law is governing everything subtly. So, be in the know, get the legit info, and keep yourselves updated. After all, staying on the right side of the law is what counts, and comprehension here is the name of the game.
In this gun-slinging world of ours, knowledge is power, folks. And we’re here to give you that power straight, no chaser. Remember, the right to carry doesn’t mean freedom from responsibility. So keep your iron holstered, learn your laws, and stay safe out there.
End of the day, concealed carry reciprocity ain’t rocket science; it’s all about being aware, understanding the nuances, and playing it smart. Until the next time round, keep a sharp eye and stick with us for more gun-law wisdom.
6 Responses
ITS A TROJAN HORSE
a heavily moderated site
This is not a paradox. States have powers, not rights. However, the Federal Goverment has the duty to prevent states from violating the civil rights of individuals. Civil rights laws, the 14th Amendment, gay marriage etc. You have a right to possess a handgun for use in self defense. Some states deny that right to all, and many more to persons from out of state. All this proposed law will do is stops these denials for constitutional rights.which the Federal Gov’t has the power and duty to do.
A “liberal conservative”? Just how does THAT work? [headshake]
What Mr. Chambers seems to be ignorant of in his argument gainst the expansion of federal powers (which, I agree, in most cases is unconstitutional), Article IV Section 1 of the Constitution specifically delegates the power that the reciprocity bill invokes. The 14th Amendment applies the 2nd Amendment to the States (McDonald v. Chicago, 2010), and Article IV gives the feds the power to mandate, “by general Laws”, recognition of “the public Acts, Records and judicial Proceedings of every other State”. Since the ratification of the 14th Amendment, the 10th Amendment argument against permit reciprocity falls flat on its face.
The 14th Amendment didn’t completely wipe out the 10th; however, it did step in to supersede it viz the application of the Bill of Rights.
RIght on Brian. To make your argument even stronger, remember that the Bill of Rights set out Civil Rights – per the Declaration of Independence given by God, and thus forever limit the Federal side from stepping on them. Your “states rights” leanings would then say leave it to the states (good logic) EXCEPT that, due to civil rights abuses after the Civil War, the 14th Amendment essential says “yo, states and lesser governments, those first 9 amendments, and the 13th (freeing slaves) – they all apply to you, too.”
Civil Rights are there to protect minorities, and thus should not ever be put to a vote. The Feds saying states don’t get to infringe the 2A are a parallel to states not getting to discriminate against minorities, search our houses, or arrest us without telling us why, etc.
How can the application of constitutional amendment be considered a states rights argument? I mean all states should be following it and not infringing upon it anyway right?