During testimony in his trial, Mark Dial states he shot Eddie Irizarry because he believed Irizarry was armed, saying, “I didn’t want to get shot in the face.” The incident has ignited significant public interest as it raises questions about the use of force and decision-making in high-stress situations involving law enforcement.
Dial’s claim centers around a knife Irizarry was reportedly holding at the time of the shooting, which he asserts looked like a firearm from his perspective. This case highlights the complexities of police encounters and the immediacy of split-second judgments that can lead to tragic outcomes.
Read full story at www.inquirer.com
