During oral arguments in a case challenging California’s ban on gun silencers, Judge Kenneth Lee criticized a recent Ninth Circuit ruling on gun rights, implying it could pave the way for broader prohibitions on firearms accessories. The 2019 appointee of President Trump expressed concern that the court’s rationale might allow states to justify bans on nearly any gun-related item by citing potential misuse by criminals.
Lee’s comments underscore significant implications for current and future gun legislation, raising questions about the limits of state authority in regulating firearms. His remarks highlight the ongoing tensions within judicial interpretations of the Second Amendment as the case progresses.
Read full story at news.bloomberglaw.com
