Six members of Congress recently released a video emphasizing that military personnel must refuse to obey illegal orders, igniting significant national debate. This controversy highlights a deeper issue: many Americans are unaware of the distinct oaths that enlistments and officer ranks swear—one focusing on obedience and the other on constitutional duty—shaping how military personnel respond to unlawful commands.
The video has prompted reactions ranging from support to claims of sedition, illustrating the potential for confusion about military obligations. Experts argue that a clearer understanding of these oaths can alleviate fears regarding the military’s role in political matters, reinforcing that accountability lies with officers who are duty-bound to evaluate the legality of orders they receive.
Read full story at www.thebulwark.com
