The use of the term “assault weapons” has become a contentious issue in the ongoing gun control debate, especially after tragic events like the Newtown shooting. Gun rights advocates argue that this term inaccurately conflates semiautomatic firearms with fully automatic military-grade weapons, intent on shifting the narrative around gun ownership among law-abiding citizens.
As the terminology gains traction in media discussions, with a tenfold increase in usage since the late 1980s, it raises questions about public perception and legislative impact. Notably, the Associated Press distinguishes between “assault rifles” and “assault weapons,” highlighting a critical gap in understanding among the public about these firearms’ functionalities. This ongoing battle over nomenclature could significantly influence future gun policy.
Read full story at www.washingtonpost.com
