A petition has been filed for an en banc rehearing in the Fifth Circuit regarding the case of United States v. Peterson, which determined that noise suppressors are not considered “Arms” under the Second Amendment. This ruling, which could have far-reaching implications for firearm regulations, has sparked concerns among gun rights advocates who argue that suppressors serve essential functions like hearing protection and recoil reduction, making them integral to lawful firearm use.
The Fifth Circuit’s initial decision categorized suppressors as “firearm accessories” lacking Second Amendment protection, raising critical questions about how various firearm components are regulated. The case highlights a growing debate over the interpretation of the Second Amendment, as millions of Americans utilize suppressed firearms for various legitimate purposes. The upcoming response from the U.S. government is set for March 17, 2025, and advocates are urging a shift in the government’s stance to recognize suppressors as protected arms under the Constitution.
Read full story at reason.com
