The Wyoming Law Review’s latest edition discusses significant constitutional issues surrounding the National Firearms Act (NFA), following a symposium organized by the Firearms Research Center at the University of Wyoming College of Law. A key argument presented is that Congress may not hold the constitutional authority to ban firearms, as the NFA’s foundation lies in its revenue-raising capabilities, a stance supported by historical Supreme Court decisions.
Among the symposium’s contributors, several experts emphasize the need to rethink the classification of certain firearms like short-barreled rifles and silencers, which are now recognized as common and rarely used in crimes. The discussion raises provocative questions about Congress’s previous actions, specifically referencing a failed crusade to require registration of all firearms, making readers consider how the interpretation of the Second Amendment continues to evolve.
Read full story at reason.com
