The ongoing epidemic of gun violence has prompted criticism toward President Trump and his administration for their lack of action in addressing rising firearm shootings. Despite a few regulatory advancements, such as restrictions on “ghost guns,” many advocates argue that the overall response remains insufficient against a backdrop of increasing fatalities and recurring mass shootings.
Critics also note that the Supreme Court has played a significant role in stymying legislative efforts, favoring historical arguments that often dismiss contemporary needs for gun regulation. As state laws vary widely, with some jurisdictions enacting stricter measures, the judicial system’s inaction leaves a fragmented legal landscape that complicates efforts to meaningfully reduce gun violence nationwide.
Read full story at www.usatoday.com
