The Trump administration’s Solicitor General, John Sauer, asserts that the Supreme Court should not have the authority to enforce nationwide injunctions against executive policies. During the oral arguments in the case of Trump v. CASA, Sauer claimed that federal courts lack the power to universally block the government’s actions, raising concerns about a potential new precedent that would allow executive orders to bypass judicial oversight, particularly regarding birthright citizenship for children born in the U.S.
The implications of this argument are significant, as it suggests that if the administration loses cases in lower courts, it may not be compelled to comply with Supreme Court rulings unless individual plaintiffs take action. This revelation––that the ruling could potentially affect only those parties specifically involved in the case––challenges over a century of legal interpretation regarding citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment. As the justices mull over the matter, the future of birthright citizenship hangs in the balance.
Read full story at washingtonmonthly.com
