For Serious Gun Lovers

5.56 vs 7.62 – Which Ammo Do You Need?

7.62nato vs 5.56nato

There are many debates that have long been going on in the gun world, and one of the most fiercest has been whether the AR-15 or the AK-47 is the superior tactical rifle. Or which is better, 5.56 vs 7.62?

Both of these rifles have a very rich history in both military and civilian hands, and the respective followings they have are die hard and loyal.

Choosing between these two weapons, however, may not be so much an issue of which rifle is superior but rather which caliber is superior.



That’s because the AR-15 and the AK-47 use two entirely different calibers: the 5.56x45mm NATO and the 7.62x39mm.

The purpose of this article is not to settle the debate between these two rifles and their respective calibers, but rather to present you with some information about the two so you can make the decision for yourself as to which one you need between the 5.56 vs 7.62.

Let’s start by learning a little about the history of these two calibers:

Get Great Guns And Ammo Deals!


No Spam - No Selling Your Email

Brief History of the 5.56X45mm

5.56×45mm NATO measuring with a ruler

The 5.56x45mm NATO round was developed because the United States was looking for a lighter caliber to replace the 7.62x51mm NATO (which was almost identical to the .308 Winchester round) that they were using in their issued M14 rifles.

The 7.62x51mm was an effective round to be sure, and the .308 remains the most popular centerfire rifle caliber today. But it was also heavy, produced high recoil, was uncontrollable in fully automatic, and the M14 itself was too unwieldy for close quarters jungle combat in Vietnam.

The solution the military came up with was to adopt the M16/M4 series of rifles, and with it, the 5.56x45mm NATO round (which is very similar to the .223 Remington).

The individual infantry soldier could carry more 5.56 ammo on his person at once, and the caliber also produced lighter recoil even if it had less range and power than the 7.62x51mm round.

Brief History of the 7.62x39mm

7-62x39 FMJThe 7.62x39mm round was developed in the 1940s in the Soviet Union, who were also on the prowl for a new semi-automatic service rifle to replace the venerable Mosin Nagant in 7.62x54R.

The 7.62x39mm was designed to be an all-purpose, intermediate round that would fulfill a variety of roles.

Two of the most popular rifles chambered for the round are the SKS and the AK-47, the latter of which was adopted into service by the Soviet Union and became the most prolific military rifle of all time.

NOTE: from now on, these two calibers will be referred to as 5.56 and 7.62.

5.56 vs 7.62 – Velocity

Velocity refers to the speed of the bullet, or in other words, how fast it reaches your target.


5.56 vs 7.62 Velocity chart


Generally speaking, higher velocity is a good thing. Not only does it means it will strike your intended target faster, it also means there are less factors at play that could throw your bullet off. Greater velocity also typically equals superior penetration and expansion.

Which is Faster a 5.56 vs 7.62?

And when we look at the 5.56 and 7.62, there is absolutely no question that the 5.56 is the faster bullet. It’s a lighter round and yet has a very similar powder load, and therefore there is more velocity when it exist the barrel.

Whereas a 5.56 will usually get you around 3,000 FPS (feet per second) out the barrel, a 7.62 will get you around 2,500 or so.

But does this mean that the 5.56 is the superior round? Not necessarily. The 7.62 may not be quite as fast, but that doesn’t mean it’s slow.

Furthermore, 7.62 rounds tend to hold their velocity just a tad better over greater distances. For instance, at 500 yards, the velocity of the 5.56 will drop to around 1,600 FPS, while the 7.62 will drop to around 1,200 FPS.

5.56 vs 7.62 – Recoil

Recoil is a major factor when choosing which caliber to use, because it determines the controllability of your weapon and how well you can get accurate follow up shots off.


5-56 VS. 7-62 Recoil


While the recoil of the two calibers, at least to you, may be based on your perception of them, we can scientifically measure the recoil of any caliber through feet per pound. This doesn’t tell you what the ‘felt recoil,’ of the round is, but it does tell you the recoil energy of the round.

The 7.62 generates a small number of more pounds of force than the 5.56, and the felt recoil should be slightly greater for more shooters as well. The only time this would be an issue is when you are firing successive rounds.

Both calibers, however, produce under ten feet per pounds of energy, and both are controllable.

5.56 VS. 7.62 Stopping Power

There are a few ways to determine the stopping power of a bullet, but the two most prominent ways are their energy and their penetration.


5.56 vs. 7.62x54 on Steel


Which has Greater Muzzle Energy a 5.56 vs 7.62?

The 7.62 has lightly greater muzzle energy than the 5.56. While the 7.62 on average produces kinetic muzzle energy of 1,500 feet per pound, the 5.56 will produce around 1,300. Not a huge difference, but a difference nonetheless. This means that your target will be struck with more force from the 7.62 than the 5.56 NATO.

As far as penetration is concerned, it really depends on the specific type of bullet that you are using.

What we can say is that the 7.62 is the heavier round, but the sectional densities differences are still very minimal. Again, it really depends on the type of bullet.

Generally speaking, the consensus is that the 7.62 has a slight advantage over the 5.56 in terms of stopping power, being a larger and heavier round and more ballistically similar to the .30-30 Winchester round.

The 5.56 was actually chosen by the military because of its tendency to wound an enemy soldier rather than kill, which takes two people out of the fight rather than one because in addition to bringing down the wounded man, you’ve also distracted one of his comrades who will run over to help him.

5.56 VS. 7.62 – Accuracy

Ask anyone if the AR-15 or the AK-47 is the more accurate platform, and most people who have experience with the two will answer that the AR-15 is more accurate. But is this because of the rifles themselves, or because of their respective calibers?


7.62 vs 5.56 bullet energy loss chart


Well, when we look at the calibers, data does show that the 5.56 is slightly more accurate. As we have noted previously, the 5.56 produces more muzzle velocity. But furthermore, it also typically has a flatter trajectory over longer distances, which would lend itself to superior accuracy.

That being said, both calibers are suitably accurate for the battlefield, and you should have no trouble hitting your targets with a properly sighted in rifle out to a hundred yards or so. Accuracy can be greatly increased by using an AR-15 scope.

7.62 vs 5.56 – Availability

Both the 5.56 and 7.62 are popular rounds and reasonably priced, but there is undeniably a greater selection of bullets to choose from with the 5.56.


7.62 vs 5.56 - Availability


Not only are you slightly more likely to find 5.56 in a sporting goods store, you’re also going to find many different types of ammunition for the 5.56, while your choices will be a little more limited with the 7.62.

Favorite 5.56 VS. 7.62 Ammo Picks


Product NameWhere to Buy
image of PMC X-TAC 5.56 62 GR AMMOPMC X-TAC 5.56 62 GR AMMOCheck Price
image of TULA 7.62X39 AMMO 122 GRAIN FMJTULA 7.62X39 AMMO 122 GRAIN FMJCheck Price






This is the new Check Price Button


Clean shooting 5.56 ammo for productive days at the range. Clip Strips make it easy to reload.





This is the new Check Price Button


This 7.62×39 TulAmmo ammunition is what the SKS and AK-style rifles were designed for. It has a 122 Grain Full Metal Jacket bullet at 2445 fps. Polymer coated steel cases keep the ammo affordable, but still reliable.

Which Ammo is Better 5.56 VS. 7.62?

You can be the judge of that, but what we can definitively say is each of the following:

  • The 5.56 is lighter and the 7.62 is heavier
  • The 5.56 produces more muzzle velocity
  • The 5.56 has a flatter trajectory
  • The 5.56, theoretically, would be easier to shoot accurately (though this would be more dependent on which rifle you are more comfortable using)
  • The 5.56 has greater bullet selection over the 7.62
  • The 7.62 holds its velocity slightly greater over longer distances, even if the muzzle velocity is lower
  • The 7.62 produces more muzzle kinetic energy
  • The 7.62 produces slightly more recoil energy (AKA, felt recoil is likely to be a little more noticeable)
  • The 7.62, theoretically, produces slightly greater stopping power, (though this is really more dependent on the specific type of bullet you are using rather than the caliber itself)

Based on the above information, you should be able to make a decision for yourself.

Or, if you have the funds available, you can take the easy road and go with both.

Thanks for reading guys and remember to get ear protection for shooting when practicing with any firearm.

Recommended Reading

Ultimate Guide To Bullets

.40 Cal & .45 Cal Bullets

Matching Twist And Bullets

Bullets To The X-treme

2 Responses

  1. An excellent review. What I would point out is that a new choice of caliber is often linked to the choice of weapons to use them. More often than not, the weapon comes first. When choosing the Kalashnikov, for instance, the easiness to manufacture the rifle was a decisive factor. I still remember from when I was working in the defense industry in my country in Eastern Europe that the CEO of our assault rifle factory said that he loved about the AK 47 that you could literally “make it on your lap – except the barrel, of course”. One time, just to see what happens, he doubled the tolerance of all parts – again, except the barrel – and the rifle still worked.
    Second, there is one more aspect that has not been discussed in this review and might be pointed out – the propellant. When discussing among us, the techs, the choice of switching to the NATO standard .22 ammo, they’ve expressed repeated concerns related to the triple-base powder used with this round being hard on the barrel.
    For those who need the info, triple- base powder uses a small amount of dynamite (well, nitroglycerin if you are picky) to increase chamber pressure, and nitroguanidine to reduce flame temperature and barrel erosion. Apparently, given the Vietnam experience and the more recent Battle of Wanat in Afghanistan in 2008, the problem has not been completely solved more that 40 years after having the round in service, so in my opinion they had a point.
    They mentioned also that a Yugoslav-made AK-47 built for .22 ammunition appeared to have a stronger recoil, apparently due to the higher rate of fire added to the higher muzzle velocity (and hence relative return impulse). The stronger recoil, however, did not seem to have significant implications on the actual use.
    It is worth mentioning that the Chinese, too, decided they need a new caliber, that the optimal caliber is between 6 and 6.9 (if I remember correctly), and they went for a value of 6 mm.
    Only the future will tell which caliber is best suited for the infantry combat of that day. Given the implications, my hope is that we’ll never find out.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GND Popup Giveaway Final 1

Your emails are safe with us. We never sell our emails and value your trust.
Weekly Deals are sent out on Tuesday at 7PM Eastern Time.